“This footprint covers these entities, sites, and operations.”Getting this clear up front makes your numbers easier to explain, repeat, and compare.
What is an organisational boundary?
An organisational boundary defines:- Which entities are included (legal entities, business units, brands)
- Which sites are included (offices, warehouses, venues, facilities)
- Which operations you’re responsible for (owned, leased, operated)
- Organisational boundary – who and what you’re including
- Scopes 1, 2, 3 – how emissions are classified within that boundary
Approaches to organisational boundaries
Most standards (e.g. GHG Protocol) talk about two main approaches: For most Salvidia users, operational control is the right default. You can still note important joint ventures or investments in your methodology.If you don’t have external reporting requirements yet, don’t overcomplicate this. Start with the entities and sites you clearly control day-to-day, and refine later if needed.
What to include (in practice)
When defining your organisational boundary, think in three layers:1. Legal entities
List the entities you’re including, for example:Example Pty Ltd (Australia)Example NZ Limited (New Zealand)
- Start with just one core entity, or
- Include a cluster of related entities if they’re operated as one group.
2. Sites and operations
Within those entities, list the major sites and operations:- Offices, warehouses, factories
- Retail stores, venues, event spaces
- Data centres or key third-party facilities (if you effectively control the space)
3. Special cases
Flag anything that needs a specific decision, such as:- Joint ventures
- Franchised locations
- Long-term leased assets
- Shared facilities with complex landlord–tenant relationships
How Salvidia models organisational boundaries
In Salvidia:- Each organisation assessment is linked to your workspace’s company profile.
- Inside that assessment, you can represent multiple entities and sites using:
- Tags
- Custom fields
- Separate tables or breakdowns (depending on your setup)
- Set the assessment up as:
Example Group – AU & NZ – FY2025 Organisation footprint - Use tags or fields to distinguish:
Entity: AUvsEntity: NZSite: Sydney HQ,Site: Melbourne Warehouse, etc.
- Report one total footprint for the group, and
- Still slice results by entity or site if needed.
Multi-entity groups and subsidiaries
If you operate multiple entities, you have a few options.- Single assessment (group)
- Separate assessments (per entity)
- Hybrid
Use one organisation assessment that covers all included entities.Good for:
- Groups that operate as a single unit
- High-level reporting to a parent company or board
- Using tags/fields for sub-entities and sites
- Clearly naming the assessment so it’s obvious which entities are included
Organisational vs operational boundaries
Two related decisions:- Organisational boundary – which entities and sites are “yours”
- Operational boundary – which emissions and scopes you include for those entities
- Whether to include all Scope 1 and 2 emissions
- Which Scope 3 categories are in or out for now
- How you treat things like employee commuting or home working
Example: simple organisational boundary
“This footprint coversExample Pty Ltdand all operations under its control in Australia for FY2025.
It includes owned and leased offices, warehouses, and company vehicles.”
- Organisational boundary: Example Pty Ltd (Australia)
- Operational boundary: All Scope 1 and 2, plus selected Scope 3 categories
- One organisation assessment:
Example Pty Ltd – FY2025 Organisation footprint
Example: group with AU and NZ entities
“This footprint coversYou could:Example Groupoperations in Australia and New Zealand for FY2025, includingExample Pty LtdandExample NZ Limited.”
- Use one group assessment with tags for AU and NZ, or
- Use two assessments (one AU, one NZ) and combine the results manually in your reporting.
How to document your boundary in Salvidia
When you create an organisation assessment, we recommend adding a short boundary statement in your internal notes or methodology section:- Which entities and sites are included
- Which major pieces are excluded (if any)
- Which approach you used (operational control vs equity share)
- Any special treatment for joint ventures, franchises, or shared sites
- Reproduce the footprint next year
- Explain differences between years or between entities
- Answer questions from auditors, clients, or stakeholders
Quick checklist
Before you start entering data, you should be able to answer:- ✅ Which entities are included in this assessment?
- ✅ Which sites and operations are in scope?
- ✅ Are we using operational control or equity share as our boundary lens?
- ✅ How are we treating any joint ventures, franchises, or shared sites?
- ✅ Have we written this down somewhere that future-you (or your team) can find?
Where to go next
- Learn how scopes sit within your boundary in Scopes 1, 2, and 3 explained
- See how to balance perfection and practicality in Data quality tiers (if you’ve enabled it)
- Or jump into Create your first assessment and start putting this into practice.